Dear All

ReferWith reference to the trailing email, we would like to clarify a few things regarding the deduction of amountamounts which waswere not in conversation or waswere not prior finalized .

Regarding the deduction of damage of cable, we had clarified our stand onstance in the email dated 18/08/2020 as attached.
It is really unacceptable & unprofessional to deduct the amount without any proof or communication. whichThis is unethical and a breach of contract.

Ref to the approved method of statement point noNo. 4 that (attached) , our working area should be under the supervision of PCC and we are not responsible for damage of any service which was not prior informed or notified to us.
Apart from that, the damaged area was handed over by DME a week before the incident and a scrap removal contractor was working over there on the incident date.

Pointing back to the subject, we need clear clarification from PCC to proceed further.

In Additionaddition to that , Manymany areas in which we worked, as per the instruction of PCC, which was a variation, had been rejected by Engineer Nagarajan unwantedly unnecessarily. (Approx Value of 5500BD), (invoice attached).

We worked in many projects very closely and successfully on many projects with PCC, and we are expecting a positive response from PCC asthem at the earliest, to solve this issue.